Has your company got a social media policy?

[This post originally featured on EamonnMallie.com]

Social media can be a powerful marketing tool that any business, no matter how big or small, should use, but what are your policies governing its use? Perhaps a better place to start is to define and understand why you are using social media in the first place. If it’s for any of the following reasons, you probably shouldn’t be using them:

  • Because it’s cool.
  • Your competitors are using facebook, so you feel you must as well.
  • Marketing people tell me that ‘social’ is good for business.

Being part of a social network is much more than just a marketing gimmick, it’s about raising awareness of your business and giving your business a profile that goes beyond bricks and mortar.

Before you get started on a social media strategy, review your current website. If your site is up-to-date and accurately reflects your brand and organisation then you are good to go. However, there is nothing worse than coming across a link on twitter and being directed to a website that has out of date content or there are no contact details. How can your (potential) customers take you seriously?

So, assuming your website is up-to-date where do you start?

  • First you need to define your goals e.g. do you want to improve engagement between you and your customers?
  • You need to determine who is going to manage your social media presence. Is this something that one person can manage or does it require multiple users?
  • If you have multiple users, do your social media policies cover different roles? Do you have a workflow in place?
  • You will need to draw up a policy or some guidelines on how to use social media sites. What sort of content will you publish? How quickly will you respond to questions?
  • How will you measure performance? Can you establish a set of key performance indicators?

Governance

  • What about your staff, can they use social media while in work? 
  • Do you encourage them to promote the business? 
  • Do you encourage them to speak on behalf of the organisation? 
  • Have you addressed what could go wrong? 

This is why you need strong policies and guidelines in place. A lot of this is covered by common sense, but sometimes a little training can go a long way to preventing a PR disaster.

Who?
If your business is big enough to justify its own IT department and also has a marketing / communications team who controls social media use?
If there is any debate about this, let’s just lay it to rest now. It’s not an IT role. Social media use should reside within your communications, marketing, sales or customer service teams. Or perhaps its just you the small business owner. The point is that it’s not an easy task and should not be approached lightly.

How?
Another question that should be answered by policy is how do your staff actually get the content our there? In other words, can I use my own personal phone to send a tweet to the company account? Is this appropriate?

Reputation Management 
We have all read about the PR nightmares that have started on twitter or facebook and a social media policy will not guarantee that this wont happen to you, but it does enable you to react to the situation in a professional manner. You will be aware of reputation management and how (especially in a word of mouth business) important this is, but remember that if something goes viral on social media that this can have a positive or a negative impact on your business and you need to be prepared for both scenarios.

Sharing
Social media is all about sharing and there are numerous examples of social media policies in the wild. Here are just a few:


And the reason why you implement a policy:

Has your company got a social media policy? Is it managed or policed internally? Do you think that it is restrictive on staff? Let us know in the comments section below.

Journalism is free

News International have embarked on an interesting project: From June they will charge users to access The Times and Sunday Times websites a small fee to view content.

“Readers will be offered a week’s subscription for £2, or a day’s access for £1, to two new sites, www.thetimes.co.uk and www.sundaytimes.co.uk.

Rupert Murdoch has been saying for a long time that quality news and journalism should not be given away free. He’s right; journalist’s deserve to be paid for their work. What he’s wrong about is who should pay. Does he think that because people currently pay for newspapers that people should expect to pay for online news as well? It’s chalk and cheese. Two completely different products with differing user experiences and demands. When I view a story online I demand pictures, audio and / or video. I’m not interested in just a text article. This has the potential to be the premium offering the industry needs, but instead the industry thinks it needs to cover everything (in less detail) and reduce the amount of resources used on investigative journalism. The end product is neither premium nor what the user demands.

News has been undervalued for a long time; from hourly news on the radio to several dedicated 24 hour news channels consumers can access a variety of news sources for free and at their convenience. How many copies of Metro (a free paper) are handed out each morning? How many free online news sites already exist?

Print cannot compete with that.  It’s yesterday’s news, but news papers can compete online.  Here it’s a level playing field, except they have the advantage of old media behind them.  They have resources, they have experienced journalists, they have sources, they have followers and still they want to charge for access!  If I was in charge I would be supporting my news site through dedicated advertising (it can be done just look at internet TV).  I would look to consolidate the industry – how many digital editions of the same news do we really need? I’d ask these question:
What is it that my news paper offers that would get users to pay?
Why would I the pay to access old news online?

The question News International should be asking is how we can generate revenue from our existing users? What additional services can we provide that users will pay for?

This saga will continue to run and I’m sure News International will sacrifice some of it’s best known titles as it hunts for the holy grail.

What do you think, will you pay to access The Times?